Why Tony Abbott can’t be ignored

Why Tony Abbott can’t be ignored

Why Tony Abbott can’t be ignored
Paul Bongiorno:
Australian politics surely could not get more bizarre than the spectacle of the Turnbull government tearing itself apart this week over what it dismisses as a second-order issue. And it all comes down to the dynamics generated by one embittered man. Although many complain that the continued focus on Tony Abbott is nauseating, to ignore him is to be blind to the political reality of where our national government finds itself.

And make no mistake: the dumped prime minister couldn’t be more delighted. On Monday, the fortnightly Newspoll delivered another reality check for Malcolm Turnbull. His government is still trailing Labor by six points and it’s the 17th survey where the Coalition has come second.

Abbott just so happened to be in 2GB shock jock Ray Hadley’s studio, one of his favourite comfort zones, on the day the poll was published. With a TV networks pool camera trained on him, the humble Liberal backbencher could scarcely keep a straight face when Hadley, before the radio interview began, cheekily drew attention to the 17th bad result. “Yep, yep,” was Abbott’s response as he looked towards the camera. “Thirteen to go, old mate,” Hadley continued. “Yeah,” Abbott said, acknowledging the benchmark of 30 bad Newspolls in a row that Turnbull nominated for a leadership change.

The high-rating Macquarie Media radio network, which plays from Sydney into Queensland and the ACT, has given Abbott eight hours’ airtime in just 20 weeks, according to the ABC’s Media Watch. It does it because Abbott is a ratings grabber. And he is because, as another of the network’s presenters, Ben Fordham, puts it, the former prime minister always comes with something to say.

The managing director of JWS Research, John Scales, has no doubt about “what could stop the rot for Turnbull”. His extensive techniques for measuring the public mood confirm what Turnbull’s moderate allies in the party are convinced is the case. Scales says for every vote Turnbull saves by caving to the conservatives – whether they be in the Liberal or the National party – he loses two votes from the centre and the soft left. In other words, Turnbull’s attraction to the broader voting public has been sacrificed. His moderate colleagues believe his lead as preferred prime minister and as Liberal leader compared with the other options means he could retrieve the situation. But, as the Fairfax Ipsos poll found this week, voters think “he has to grow some balls”.

In the run-up to Monday’s cabinet meetings and emergency Liberal party-room gathering, called by Turnbull to address the crisis precipitated by the threat of a Liberal backbench marriage equality revolt, senior moderate ministers urged Turnbull to seize the opportunity to grab back the initiative from Abbott. The argument went that the government had already discharged its obligation to voters by attempting to get the plebiscite through the senate, now he should argue for what everyone knows he believes in and define the debate. Turnbull was told the plan B option – a non-compulsory postal vote – was highly problematic and if successfully challenged in the High Court would make the government look like “it couldn’t run a chook raffle”.

Plan B was the brainchild of leading conservatives Peter Dutton and Mathias Cormann. Their counter-argument was on the need to hold the Coalition together, especially in light of threats from Nationals backbencher Andrew Broad that he would quit, rob the government of its majority and go to the crossbench if the free vote was allowed. The moderates argued Turnbull should call Broad’s bluff and stare down anyone threatening to bring down the government.

There were signs the penny had dropped for Nationals leader Barnaby Joyce that if he ended the Coalition government over the free vote it would also be the end for him. His ability to deliver on the various boondoggles he was promising to regional Australia would disappear. Even the perennial Nationals renegade, George Christensen, was telling people that if the Liberals went with the free vote he wouldn’t quit the government, just be more prepared to cross the floor more often in future – depending on the issue, of course.

Besides, the Nationals were saying publicly that everyone should stop talking about gay marriage and start talking about more important things. But their intransigence on the issue has guaranteed that it will continue to fester for months. Just as it did in the past two weeks. It will overshadow whatever else the government is doing, especially when key events flare, such as a High Court challenge to the postal vote or the vote itself, if it survives. Veteran Liberal backbencher Russell Broadbent warned the joint party room on Tuesday that the postal vote would turn to political mush for the government.

If there were any doubts the campaign for the $122 million non-compulsory “letter to 16 million voters” will get ugly and intense, they were quickly dispelled midweek. Tony Abbott – see above – came to the doors at Parliament House to run the lines he has already honed: “It is an opportunity for every Australian who cares about this to have his or her say, and again I say to you, if you don’t like same-sex marriage, vote no; if you are worried about freedom of speech and freedom of religion, vote no; and if you don’t like political correctness, vote no, because this is the best way to stop it in its tracks.”

It was too much for Abbott’s sister, Christine Forster. Forster, a Liberal Sydney City councillor, who makes no secret about wanting to marry her female partner, shot back on social media: “If you value mutual respect: vote yes. If you want all Australians to be equal: vote yes. If you believe in free speech: vote yes.”

The Abbott grab bag of alt-right grievances amply demonstrates his crusade against same-sex marriage is merely a proxy against the sort of modernity he identifies with Turnbull and contemporary Australia. Ironically, he wasn’t too keen on a postal plebiscite on Monday. He urged Turnbull to keep bowling up the compulsory plebiscite, for years if necessary. But now that has been ditched after its second senate defeat, anything will do as long as it keeps the government off balance.

At his Monday news conference, Turnbull bristled when he was asked why he was following and not leading. “Strong leaders carry out their promises,” he shot back. “Weak leaders break them.” With a straight-jawed firmness, he said, “I am a strong leader.” The last time he gave a similar self-assessment it had a greater ring of truth to it. That was in 2009 – the day he lost the leadership by one vote to Abbott over pricing carbon. He said, “I am a strong leader. I don’t take a backward step. I am prepared to stand up for what I believe in.”

Now he is only half-heartedly prepared to stand up for what he believes in. He says he will not be campaigning for a yes vote, although he and his wife, Lucy, will vote in the affirmative. He has, he says, “many other calls on his time”.

Turnbull’s weakness of leadership came with a disappointing thud in question time. Labor’s Bill Shorten drew attention to a pamphlet authorised by a former Howard government minister, Chris Miles. He said it “falsely claims children of gay couples are more likely to abuse drugs, have sexually transmitted diseases and be unemployed”. Shorten wondered how this fits with the prime minister’s guarantee of a respectful discussion. He asked why the prime minister was making Australians pay $122 million to give licence to this vile rubbish.

Inexplicably, Turnbull did not condemn the sentiments as a failure of the good sense he believes a majority have. Instead, he gave a green light to the gross prejudice of the pamphlet. Unlike Labor, he said, his side of politics, “is not going to shut down democracy”. Is it any wonder that LGBTI people in Turnbull’s Sydney electorate of Wentworth are dreading the lead-up to the postal vote should it happen? Already, counselling services are reporting increasing traffic from distressed, vulnerable people.

John Scales says there are real doubts the Australian Bureau of Statistics will be able to deliver a result in the time set down. He says a simpler and more accurate way to gauge public opinion would be to robo-call a weighted sample of 150,000 with a simple yes or no choice. It would cost just $1 million. It would also deny the bigots and zealots a platform to play on voters’ prejudices and fears.

Dean Smith, the Liberal senator who precipitated the amazing scenes of the past week, is holding his fire with his private member’s bill. He is prepared to give Turnbull’s November deadline for a vote a chance. He now knows he has the numbers in the house to suspend standing orders if Turnbull’s plan B fails to deliver. Nothing will stop him if it does.

In the same 2GB interview, Abbott did not consistently apply his new-found pious regard for not breaking promises. He urged Turnbull to ditch the promised clean energy target because it was Labor–Green theology pushing up prices. The chutzpah of it is just astounding.


Paul Mustard
Paul Mustard 4 months ago

I saw the finance minister being interviewed saying the coalition doesn't break election promises...it was like he cognitively disowned the first two years of when Abbott was PM...now Abbott seems to be the big driver of this..I think make no mistake, there's an insidious section in the coalition who are only manipulating the govt because of their one seat majority for their own selfish aims..They are clearly team players!!!

Geoffrey Davie
Geoffrey Davie 4 months ago

This whole scenario of wasteful childish stupidty, has been orchestrated by the bitter mad RC abbott, for and on behalf of the vile RC church, for no other reason, than to delay the inevitable! He is stupid and divisive, and along with Pell and church criminality has taken us back to 1950s sectarianism! Bugger him!

Phil Lamont
Phil Lamont 4 months ago

Geoffrey Davie not exactly, Scabbott is Roman Catholic but he takes his directions from the infamous Australian "Christian" lobby sect, a loose group of fundamentalists, mainly Brethren. This group is aligned with far right religious nutters in the USA who given them strategies to follow. They know attacking marriage Equality will not get them far. In their eyes it is better to come from other angles and lie about safe school programs or gay people's children. They have no problem getting down into the gutter as long as they think it will win them points . They are an utter disgrace.

Graeme Henchel
Graeme Henchel 4 months ago

This is much more important than just LGBTI rights. It is about the type of society we have. It is a chance to tell Abbott and his ilk that their archaic and divisive view of Australia is not wanted.

For Abbott this issue is used to divide the community and differentiate him self from spineless Shallow Mal.

I'll be voting YES for marriage equality but also against the views and influence of Tony Abbott and his corrosive sycophants. Abbott is the most dangerous and destructive politician in the past twenty years. He must be stopped.

Brian Teitzel
Brian Teitzel 4 months ago

I find it amazing that:
1. The EVANGELISTS are so vocal;
2. The attitudes of some people towards homosexuals is reverting back to the hatred of the 80's AIDS ERA and the 10,000 years of religious persecution or prejudices.
3. People have this FROZEN definition of "marriage" that dates back to the 1866 legal definition or back to the origins in civilised society 3000 years ago or even back to the creation of two genders to the exclusion of the wide spectrum of human sexuality.
4. The focus on our creature features rather than our human side - the heart, the mind and the spirit - our humanity.

Neville Smith
Neville Smith 4 months ago

Sorry Paul, but as I see it, the contrary applies. Those who do not ignore Abbott destroy themselves.

That goes for both Turnbull and Shorten. Turnbull has already destroyed himself by demonstrating he is a gutless, spineless jelly fish by not taking on and destroying the influence of Abbott and his RRWNJs, be they religous or not.

Shorten's Labor is basking in greatness for leading in the polls 17 times in a row. But the Labor party fails to see that Shorten too has destroyed himself to the extent that he will never be PM, trailing behind a fatally wounded Turnbull in the preferred PM stakes. Again, in Shorten's case it is all about having tied himself to Abbott's most extreme anti-humanitarian asylum seeker and refugees policies.

At the end of the day I suspect Australia will vote for the higher rating preferred PM, Turnbull, at the next election.

That is of course if one or other of the two major parties do not change their leader before the next election.

As I see it, the first party to change its leader before the next election will lead government after the next election (most probably as a minority government), just as the LNP did with gutless, spineless, jelly fish Turnbull at the last election.

Add new comment
Global Citizen Mon, 12/18/2017 - 14:07
Wales Rugby Online Mon, 12/18/2017 - 14:01

Northampton Saints to approach Wales coach Warren Gatland

It looks like he's about to be offered the chance to walk away from the Wales job now.
View more 37 likes - 13 shares - 6 comments
Washington Post Mon, 12/18/2017 - 13:45

Opinion | How China got a U.S. senator to do its political bidding

"In Washington, political and policy leaders are just waking up to the scope and scale of China’s efforts to interfere."Via Washington Post Opinions, Outlook, and PostEverything
View more 38 likes - 26 shares - 6 comments
The Sydney Morning Herald Mon, 12/18/2017 - 13:24

Pamela Anderson calls on Peter Dutton to investigate animal cruelty on Manus Island

There's never a dull day in Australian politics.
View more 71 likes - 10 shares - 5 comments
Don't blame me I didn't vote Liberal Mon, 12/18/2017 - 08:26
Don't blame me I didn't vote Liberal Mon, 12/18/2017 - 03:22
Don't blame me I didn't vote Liberal Mon, 12/18/2017 - 02:59
Don't blame me I didn't vote Liberal Mon, 12/18/2017 - 00:42

Brandis off to London, sparking pre-Christmas Cabinet reshuffle

Senator Brandarse to replace Alexander Downer as Australia's High Commissioner to the UK, as part of a broader pre-Christmas reshuffle of Malcolm Turnbull's cabinet to be detailed tomorrow.
View more 12 likes - 3 shares - 9 comments
Don't blame me I didn't vote Liberal Sun, 12/17/2017 - 06:23

Nationals deputy Bridget McKenzie charged taxpayers to attend shooting awards

Another Coalition rorter with lame excuses.
View more 52 likes - 15 shares - 6 comments
Don't blame me I didn't vote Liberal Sun, 12/17/2017 - 02:49
Don't blame me I didn't vote Liberal Sun, 12/17/2017 - 01:30

Labor puts scandal-prone MPs on notice - 9News

Liberal hypocrisy in the crosshairs.
View more 70 likes - 7 shares - 5 comments
Don't blame me I didn't vote Liberal Sat, 12/16/2017 - 09:49